题目内容
Scientists have long believed one way to stop the Earth’s atmosphere from warming is by planting more trees. The idea is that more trees take in or absorb some of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is a gas released by cars, factories and other human activities. The gas traps heat in the Earth’s atmosphere, which warms the planet. However, two new studies have found that trees may not be as helpful in reducing carbon dioxide as had been thought.
The first study was done at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina. Researchers pumped extra carbon dioxide into a test area where pine trees were growing. The trees grew thirty-four percent faster during the first three years. However, in time, the trees slowed to about their normal growth rate. The scientists say this is because trees need other nutrients, such as nitrogen.
In the second study, researchers from Duke and Bowdoin College in Brunswick, Maine examined the soil around trees. They discovered that as the leaves broke down into the soil, all the carbon was not trapped in the soil. Much of it was released into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide.
Forest planting has been a part of negotiations on a world agreement to reduce greenhouse gases that scientists believe cause global warming. The United States, Canada, Japan and some other industrial countries have supported the idea. But this new research suggests the idea is not as effective as environmental activists had thought. Scientist Ram Oren of Duke University led the study on tree growth. He says that earlier estimates on the ability of forests to absorb carbon dioxide were overly hopeful.
Some scientists not involved in the studies say the research provides some of the first evidence on how trees react to carbon dioxide. Other scientists say the research disputes(对……质疑) a belief among some coal and power companies. The companies say that rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will not create harmful global warming. Instead, they say it will increase forests and other plants.
1.What is the purpose of this passage?
A.Introduce some new ideas about the relationship between trees and carbon dioxide.
B.Introduce recent condition of global industrial pollution.
C.Call on people to plant more trees to reduce greenhouse gases.
D.Point out that power companies should be responsible for the rising levels of carbon
dioxide.
2.Why did the researchers do the TWO studies?
A.To prove that trees may not be as helpful in reducing carbon dioxide as had been thought.
B.To get more oxygen from these trees.
C.To evaluate(评价,评估)the maximum carbon dioxide the trees can absorb
D.To see the growth rate of these trees.
3.What happened to the leaves falling from the trees in the second study?
A.They broke down and the main parts turned into oxygen.
B.They broke down and the carbon content had mainly turned into carbon dioxide.?
C.They broke down and the carbon dioxide content was mainly absorbed in the soil.
D.They absorbed more carbon dioxide.?
4.Scientist Ram Oren is for the opinion that common beliefs of the tree’s ability to absorb carbon dioxide are .
A.based B.insightful C.overoptimistic D.totally wrong
5.The word “it” in the last paragraph probably refers to .
A.carbon dioxide B.nitrogen C.atmosphere D.coal
AABCA