题目内容
A federal agency on Tuesday called for a ban on all cellphone use by drivers -- the most far-reaching recommendation up to now — saying its decision was based on a decade of investigations into distraction-related(与分散注意力有关的) accidents, as well as growing concerns that powerful mobile devices are giving drivers even more reasons to look away from the road.
As part of its recommendation, the National Transportation Safety Board is urging states to ban drivers from using hands-free devices, including wireless headsets. No state now has made laws to ban such activity, but the Board said that drivers faced serious risks from talking on wireless headsets, just as they do by taking a hand off the wheel to hold a phone to their ears.
However, the concern was heightened by increasingly powerful phones that people can use to send e-mails, watch movies and play games.
"Every year, new devices are being on sale." she said. "People are attracted to update their Facebook page, to play music with cellphone, as if sitting at a desk. But they are driving a car."
The agency based its recommendation on evidence from its investigation of numerous crashes in which electronic distraction was a major contributing factor.
Ms. Hersman said she understood that this recommendation would be unwelcome in some circles, given the number of drivers who talk and text. But she compared distracted driving to drunken driving and even smoking, which required wholesale cultural shifts to change behavior.
"It's going to be very unpopular with some people." she said. "We're not here to win a popularity contest. We're here to do the right thing. This is a difficult recommendation, but it's the right recommendation and it is time."
The agency's recommendation is not required for states to adopt such a ban. And it won't likely be agreed upon by state lawmakers who are unwillingly to anger those who have grown accustomed to using their device behind the wheel.
The ban also deserves attention because it is the first call by a federal agency to end the practice completely, rather than the partial ban that some lawmakers have put in place by allowing hands-free talking.
1.The ban on all cellphone use by drivers was put forward______.
A.after a long discussion and recommendation |
B.after about ten years' investigation in it |
C.because of the most powerful mobile devices |
D.for the reason of heading away from the road |
2.From the second paragraph we know that now______.
A.it is legal to use wireless headsets while driving |
B.wireless headsets are illegal in some states |
C.it is safe to talk on wireless headsets while driving |
D.hands-free devices can be used in some states |
3.We can know from the passage that______.
A.electronic distraction resulted in numerous crashes |
B.numerous crashes were caused by drunk driving |
C.electronic distraction contributed much to the ban |
D.the recommendation was based on electronic distraction |
4.Ms Hersman thinks that distracted driving, drunken driving and smoking______.
A.are just common behaviors |
B.can be shifted to behaviors |
C.are behaviors to be changed |
D.are just cultural behaviors |
5.Which of the following is the best title of the passage?
A.Cellphone Ban inCars |
B.Valuable Ban for Cellphones |
C.Drivers Ban Cellphones |
D.Cellphone Ban while Driving |
1.B
2.A
3.A
4.C
5.D
【解析】主旨讨论的主要就是开车时候禁止使用手机这一建议。
1.B 细节题。根据第1段2,3行its decision was based on a decade of investigations into distraction-related(与分散注意力有关的) accidents中的decade(十年)可知B正确,经过10年的调查,提出了这样的禁令。故B正确。
2.A 推理题。文章中提出,一家机构提出这样的建议禁止司机开车时用手机,说明现在仍然是可以使用的,还是合法的。故A正确。
3.A 推理题、根据文章第五段 The agency based its recommendation on evidence from its investigation of numerous crashes in which electronic distraction was a major contributing factor知道在很多事故中,因为使用手机的电子设备而导致注意力分散最后导致了事故的发生,故A正确。
4.C 根据文章第六段第2句she compared distracted driving to drunken driving and even smoking, which required wholesale cultural shifts to change behavior.可知她认为现在是整个文化转变和行为转变的时间了,故C正确。
5.D 主旨大意题。主旨讨论的主要就是开车时候禁止使用手机这一建议。
Fifty-two years ago in the USA, a little black girl named Ruby Bridges arrived at her new primary school. The school was in New Orleans, Louisiana.
As she walked toward the school’s front door, an angry crowd of people shouted at her. United States marshals walked with her. A marshal is a police officer. They were there to protect the first grader. That’s because the people didn’t want Ruby to go inside the school. But the 6-year-old walked into the school anyway. As she did, she marched into history books.
The day was Nov. 14, 1960. On that morning, little Ruby became one of the first African Americans to attend an all-white primary school in the South.
Before then, the law in many states said that black children could not attend the same schools as white children. People of different races also had to use separate public restrooms. It was called segregation. That is when people of different races are kept separate.
U.S. leaders worked to end segregation. They helped bring civil rights to all Americans. Those are the rights mean that all people should be treated equally. A few months before Ruby started school, a federal court (联邦法庭) had just ordered an end to school segregation in New Orleans.
By the time Ruby started the second grade, there were no more angry people outside her school. There were other African American students in her class. Today, children of all races go to school together.
Bridges said she was never scared to go to school during the first grade. She wasn’t really afraid and she didn’t really know what was going on at the time.
【小题1】Why was Ruby Bridges famous in the American history?
A.She served on the U.S. federal court. |
B.She got along well with the U.S. marshals. |
C.She helped end school segregation in New Orleans. |
D.She brought all rights to the Americans with U.S. leaders. |
A.White and black children couldn’t study in the same school. |
B.All people should have the right to be treated equally. |
C.Different races can use the same public convenience. |
D.Students of all races should be able to attend school together. |
A.Disappointing. | B.Acceptable. |
C.Successful. | D.Confusing. |
A federal agency on Tuesday called for a ban on all cellphone use by drivers -- the most far-reaching recommendation up to now — saying its decision was based on a decade of investigations into distraction-related (与分散注意力有关的) accidents, as well as growing concerns that powerful mobile devices are giving drivers even more reasons to look away from the road.
As part of its recommendation, the National Transportation Safety Board is urging states to ban drivers from using hands-free devices, including wireless headsets. No state now has made laws to ban such activity, but the Board said that drivers faced serious risks from talking on wireless headsets, just as they do by taking a hand off the wheel to hold a phone to their ears.
However, the concern was heightened by increasingly powerful phones that people can use to send e-mails, watch movies and play games.
“Every year, new devices are being on sale.” she said. “People are attracted to update their Facebook page, to play music with cellphone, as if sitting at a desk. But they are driving a car.”
The agency based its recommendation on evidence from its investigation of numerous crashes in which electronic distraction was a major contributing factor.
Ms. Hersman said she understood that this recommendation would be unwelcome in some circles, given the number of drivers who talk and text. But she compared distracted driving to drunken driving and even smoking, which required wholesale cultural shifts to change behavior.
“It’s going to be very unpopular with some people.” she said. “We’re not here to win a popularity contest. We’re here to do the right thing. This is a difficult recommendation, but it’s the right recommendation and it is time.”
The agency’s recommendation is not required for states to adopt such a ban. And it won’t likely be agreed upon by state lawmakers who are unwillingly to anger those who have grown accustomed to using their device behind the wheel.
The ban also deserves attention because it is the first call by a federal agency to end the practice completely, rather than the partial ban that some lawmakers have put in place by allowing hands-free talking.
【小题1】The ban on all cellphone use by drivers was put forward ______.
A.after a long discussion and recommendation |
B.after about ten years’ investigation in it |
C.because of the most powerful mobile devices |
D.for the reason of heading away from the road |
A.electronic distraction resulted in numerous crashes |
B.numerous crashes were caused by drunk driving |
C.electronic distraction contributed much to the ban |
D.the recommendation was based on electronic distraction |
A.are just common behaviors | B.can be shifted to behaviors |
C.are behaviors to be changed | D.are just cultural behaviors |
A.Cellphone Ban in Cars |
B.Valuable Ban for Cellphones |
C.Drivers Ban Cellphones |
D.Cellphone Ban while Driving |