题目内容
Changing science?Three Shanghai high school students may have recently overturned (推翻)a scientific theory found in many books.After four months of work they say the well?known Mpemba effect(姆潘巴现象)does not exist.?
Scientists are now checking to see if their discovery is real.The Mpemba effect says that hot water freezes faster than cold water.?
Ye Shasha is a Senior 3 student at Shanghai Xiangming Middle School.She first learned about the Mpemba effect from the book,100 000 Scientific Facts when she was in primary school.“I found it hard to understand but never doubted it.But our experiments show this phenomenon can never happen,”Ye said.?
Last year,an article about the Mpemba effect took first prize in a Shanghai science competition.But Huang Zengxin,a 57-year-old physics teacher in the school,found that the author made some mistakes while reasoning that hot water only freezes faster than cold water under certain conditions.?
Last November,he discussed his ideas with his students,Ye and Senior 2 Yu Shunxi who were very interested in the issue.?
They decided to do some serious research into the matter.To support their experiments,the school bought them advanced equipment.?
“I read a lot about the Mpemba effect.But,most explanations,either for or against,are usually based on guesswork(猜测).We just wanted to let detailed experimental data (数据) do the talking,”said Huang.?
Dong Jiawen,a Senior 2 from Shanghai High School,joined the team.She spent all her weekends and all winter holidays working on the project.?
“I have learnt so much from carrying out over 100 experiments,”Dong said.“Most importantly,I've realized that you have to do something yourself in order to find out the truth.Books only serve as a kind of reference(参考).”?
“The three girls have developed a matter of fact attitude to daily phenomena in the process of examining this effect,”said Huang proudly.?
The Mpemba Effect?
The Mpemba effect says that hot water freezes faster than cold water.The discovery was made by a high school student named Mpemba,in Tanzania(坦桑尼亚),Africa in 1969.He noticed the phenomenon while making ice cream.His teachers did not believe it was possible,and it took several years until university professors finally accepted his discovery.The phenomenon is extremely confusing and surprising even to most scientists. But it has been seen as real and studied in plenty of experiments.?
1.Ye Shasha .?
A.is a Senior 3 student from Shanghai High School?
B.doubted about the Mpemba effect when she was in primary school?
C.is one of the three girls who did the experiment?
D.is a very famous scientist of China?
2.Huang Zengxin .?
A.was given first prize for an article about the Mpemba effect?
B.is a physics teacher at Shanghai Xiangming Middle School?
C.discussed his ideas about this issue with his students this year?
D.is a famous physics scientist in Beijing?
3.The school .?
A.organized the science competition?
B.found three students to do the experiments?
C.bought advanced equipment to help them?
D.held a meeting to discuss this discovery
“Colour” and “color”, “favourite” and “favorite”···Have you ever wondered why Americans spell those words without a “u”? Is it because they are lazy?
Of course not. In fact, the difference in spelling was created by Noah Webster (1758—1843). He is a teacher who reformed English to make American identity stronger. Linguists(语言学家) celebrated his 250th birthday on October 16. After the Revolutionary War(1775—1783), Webster believed that Americans should have their own dictionary, rather than rely on British versions(版本). He dropped the British “u” in some words. And he changed “centre” into “center” for children to learn English by spelling words more like they sounded.
Webster wasn’t shy about expressing his opinions. In defining(定义) preposterous, he wrote: “A republican government in the hands of females is preposterous.”
Webster spent 28 years on the project before completing the 70,000-word dictionary in 1828 with his American-style spellings. He also added local words. His dictionary was widely used in schools. Linguists believed it helped a new nation achieve unity and cultural independence at a time when most were focused on political freedom.
“He was the shaper of our language and the shaper of American identity,” said Joshua Kendall, who is working on a biography(传记) about Webster. “He at last bonded(联合) us through our language.”
【小题1】 According to the passage, when he worked on his dictionary, Noah Webster did all of the following EXCEPT______.
A.dropping “u” in all the British words |
B.changing “centre” into “center” |
C.adding local words |
D.expressing his opinion. |
A.In 1758 | B.In 1783 | C.In 1800 | D.In 1828 |
A.Because he wanted to make English simple and easy. |
B.Because he wanted American English to have it own characteristics(特征). |
C.Because he wanted to make American English the best in the world. |
D.Because he wanted to show that the USA is stronger than the UK. |
A.Interesting | B.Boring | C.Unfinished | D.Meaningful |
A.Webster |
B.American identity |
C.The shaper of American English |
D.Spelling difference between American and British English. |
"Colour" and "color","favourite" and "favorite"... Have you ever wondered why Americans spell those words without a "u"? Is it because they are lazy?
Of course not. In fact,the difference in spelling was created by Noah Webster (1758-1843). He is a teacher who reformed English to make American identity stronger. Linguists (语言学家) celebrated his 250th birthday on October 16. After the Revolutionary War (1775~ 1783),Webster believed that Americans should have their own dictionary,rather than rely on British versions (版本). He dropped the British "u" in some words. And he changed "centre" into "center" for children to learn English by spelling words more like they sounded.
Webster wasn't shy about expressing his opinions. In defining (定义) preposterous (unreasonable),he wrote: "A republican government in the hands of females is preposterous."
Webster spent 28 years on the project before completing the 70,000-word dictionary in 1828 with his American-style spellings. He also added local words. His dictionary was widely used in schools. Linguists believed it helped a new nation achieve unity and cultural independence at a time when most were focused on political freedom.
"He was the shaper of our language and the shaper of American identity,"said Joshua Kendall,who is working on a biography (传记) about Webster. "He at last bonded (联合)us through our language."
【小题1】Which of the following would probably be the best title for the passage?
A.The shaper of American English. |
B.American identity. |
C.Webster's dictionary. |
D.Spelling differences between American and British English. |
A.voicing his opinion | B.changing "centre" into "center" |
C.adding local words | D.dropping "u" in all the British words |
A.Interesting. | B.Meaningful. | C.Unfinished. | D.Boring. |
A.Because he wanted to make English simple and easy. |
B.Because he wanted to show that the USA is stronger than the UK. |
C.Because he wanted to achieve political freedom. |
D.Because he wanted American English to have its own characteristics. |
A.In 1758. | B.In 1783. | C.In 1800. | D.In 1828. |
Send us your old jeans and other denim (牛仔布)!
What Are We Going to Do with All This Denim?
All the denim will be donated to COTTON FROM BLUE TO GREEN.®. This denim drive is a call-to-action to donate denim and give it "new life" by changing it into UltraTouchtm Natural Cotton Fiber Insulation (纤维隔热材料), which is used to help build houses in places that have been damaged by hurricanes, tornadoes, and other natural disasters. Your jeans will help set a record, keep clothes out of landfills (垃圾场), and build houses for families to live in! UltraTouchtm is made of 85% recycled fibers and is an environmentally safe, natural cotton fiber insolation(隔离).
It's a Fact
It takes about 500 pairs of jeans to recycle enough denim to insulate one average-size U.S. house. So send us lots!
Here's How You Can Get Involved!
1. Get a parent's permission and select as many denim clothes as you like. (Any denim clothing is OK.)
2. The denim must be used.
3. The denim can be any brand.
4. The denim can be of any color or size but must have been worn by a human (no doll clothes!).
5. Please print out this form and include it with each package!
6. Send as many jeans or denim items as you wish to:
NG Kids P.O. Box 98001 Washington, D.C. 20090-8001
Jeans must be received by June 30, 2009!
【小题1】 The activity organizer asks you to send denim clothes to ________.
A.turn them into new clothes for sale | B.prevent them from being thrown away |
C.provide clothes for the homeless | D.collect old clothes for being reused |
A. can be of any shape or color B. can be either new or second-hand
C. must be a certain brand D. Can be worn by dolls
【小题3】We can infer that UltraTouchtm may be the name of_________.
A.a brand of jeans | B.a building material | C.an organization | D.a kind of cloth |
A.a charity(慈善) act | B.a school's homework |
C.an environmental act | D.a building company' s task |
People are being lured (引诱)onto Facebook with the promise of a fun, free service without realizing they’re paying for it by giving up large amounts of personal information. Facebook then attempts to make money by selling their data to advertisers that want to send targeted messages.
Most Facebook users don’t realize this is happening. Even if they know what the company is up to, they still have no idea what they’re paying for Facebook because people don’t really know what their personal data is worth.
The biggest problem, however, is that the company keeps changing the rules. Early on, you keep everything private. That was the great thing about facebook—you could create your own little private network. Last year, the company changed its privacy rules so that many things— your city, your photo, your friends' names—were set, by default (默认)to be shared with everyone on the Internet.
According to Facebook’s vice-president Elliot Schrage, the company is simply making changes to improve its service, and if people don’t share information, they have a “less satisfying experience”.
Some critics think this is more about Facebook looking to make more money. Its original business model, which involved selling ads and putting them at the side of the page, totally failed. Who wants to look at ads when they’re online connecting with their friends?
The privacy issue has already landed Facebook in hot water in Washington. In April. Senator Charles Schumer called on Facebook to change its privacy policy. He also urged the Federal Trade Commission to set guidelines for social-networking sites.“I think the senator rightly communicated that we had not been clear about what the new products were and how people could choose to use them or not to use them,” Schrage admits.
I suspect that whatever Facebook has done so far to invade our privacy, it’s only the beginning, which is why I’m considering deactivating(撤销)my account. Facebook is a handy site, but I’m upset by the idea that my information is in the hands of people I don’t know. That’s too high a price to pay.
【小题1】What do we learn about Facebook from the first paragraph?
A.It is a website that sends messages to targeted users. |
B.It makes money by putting on advertisements. |
C.It profits by selling its users’ personal data. |
D.It provides loads of information to its users. |
A.They are reluctant to give up their personal information. |
B.They don’t know their personal data enriches Facebook. |
C.They don’t identify themselves when using the website. |
D.They care very little about their personal information. |
A.Setting guidelines for advertising on websites. |
B.Banning the sharing of users’ personal information. |
C.Working out regulations for social-networking sites. |
D.Removing ads from all social-networking sites. |
A.He is dissatisfied with its current service. |
B.He finds many of its users untrustworthy. |
C.He doesn’t want his personal data to be used in a wrong way. |
D.He is upset by its frequent rule changes. |