Question

Many drivers say the large digital billboards flashing ads every few seconds along Bay Area freeways are just too bright and too distracting. And they may be right.
A Swedish study published in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention concludes that digital billboards hold the gazes of drivers longer than two seconds. Previous studies have shown that anything that takes a driver’s eyes off the road for that length of time increases the risks of a crash. “This study proves what is common sense when it comes to digital billboards,” says Mary Tracy, president of Scenic America, a national nonprofit group that seeks to limit billboards. “Bright, constantly changing signs on the sides of roads are meant to attract and keep the attention of drivers, and this study confirms that this is exactly what they do.”
The Federal Highway Administration allowed digital signs for the first time in 2007 after concluding they did not pose a significant danger. But a follow-up report is pending (待定的) and could be released this year. California has no law banning the billboards, and is one of 39 states that allows them. “We would need to review more research, so it’s too early to call for a ban,” says Jonathan Adkins, executive director of the Governors Highway Safety Association. “There is a role for digital messaging, such as conveying urgent information and other safety messages.”
There are more than 1,800 digital billboards nationwide, more than double the number five years ago. While no data indicate an increase in accidents due to the Bay Area signs, many drivers are opposed to them.
“Monstrosities” is what Merlin Dorfman of San Jose calls them, while insurance agent David Whitlock says he has found them a major distraction. “They’re much too bright at night,” he says. “When the advertisement switches from a bright color to a darker one, your eyes cannot adjust fast enough, and you end up losing sight of the roadway.”
Officials with sign companies could not be reached for comment, but Bryan Parker, an executive vice president for Clear Channel Outdoor, told USA Today last year that “there’s no doubt in my mind that they are not a driving distraction.”

1. 1.
   Which of the following is TRUE?
   1. A.
      The brightness of digital billboards is harmful to people’s eyes
   2. B.
      The Federal Highway Administration banned digital signs in 2013
   3. C.
      There is evidence indicating an increase in accidents duo to digital billboards
   4. D.
      Digital billboards are used to convey messages
2. 2.
   What do we learn from the text?
   1. A.
      Scenic America is an organization that is in favor of digital billboards
   2. B.
      Drivers in the Bay Area are against the digital billboards
   3. C.
      California has banned digital billboards
   4. D.
      There were about 1,800 digital billboards nationwide five years ago
3. 3.
   What is Bryan Parker’s attitude towards digital billboards?
   1. A.
      Supportive
   2. B.
      Indifferent
   3. C.
      Opposed
   4. D.
      Uncertain
4. 4.
   What is the main idea of the text?
   1. A.
      Studies have shown digital billboards pose a danger to drivers
   2. B.
      People’s eyes cannot adjust fast enough to the brightness of digital billboards
   3. C.
      A study says flashing digital billboards are too distracting
   4. D.
      Experts doubt it is necessary to limit digital billboards
5. 5.
   We are most likely to find the text in the ________ section of a magazine
   1. A.
      international culture
   2. B.
      traffic and safety
   3. C.
      fashion and travel
   4. D.
      personal health

Answer 1

DBACB
试题分析：文章讲述了户外广告牌会吸引司机的注意力，影响司机的视觉增加交通事故的几率，针对这种情况出现了不同的反映，既有支持的也有反对的。
1.D细节判断题。There is a role for digital messaging, such as conveying urgent information and other safety messages.本句的意思为： 承担着传送这些数字信息的角色，比如发布紧急信息和其它的安全信息。从此句判断答案D是正确的。
2.B细节理解题。Many drivers say the large digital billboards flashing ads every few seconds along Bay Area freeways are just too bright and too distracting.句意为：许多司机说，在旧金山弯竖立的这些每几秒钟就闪现一次广告的数字广告牌太亮太分散注意力。由此可以判断B正确。
3.A细节推理题。Bryan Parker, an executive vice president for Clear Channel Outdoor, told USA Today last year that “there’s no doubt in my mind that they are not a driving distraction.”句意为： Bryan Parker, an executive vice president for Clear Channel Outdoor去年告诉今日美国（一种英文读物）说：“我看来这是毫无疑问的，它们没有引起驾驶员注意力分散。”由此可知他对户外广告牌是支持的。
4.C主题理解题。文章第一自然段概括了本文的中心，是围绕户外的广告牌太亮而分散了司机的注意力展开，下文是对这一观点的阐述。故答案应为C。
5.B 综合理解题。文章讲述的是户外广告牌对交通安全的影响，故答案B（交通与安全）是正确的。A选项是国际文化；C选项是时尚与旅行；D选项是个人健康。
考点:社会现象类文章的阅读理解。