题目内容

John Philips在青岛博爱中学任教期间,工作相当出色,最近他获该市“友谊”奖章。为此,China Daily准备刊登他的照片。请你就下表中所列的内容,写一篇120个单词左右的文字说明,简要介绍他的情况。   

姓名
John Philips
性别

国籍
美国
出生年月
1949年1月
职业
英语教师
 
 
简历
1975年毕业于中密歇根大学(Central Michigan University)
1975年~1985年在一家公司工作
1986年至今在青岛博爱中学教英语
主要事迹
1.热爱教学;专心于教学工作 
2.积极进行教学改革,课上得生动有趣
3.爱护学生
4.业余时间经常和外语老师一起研究英语教学改革

练习册系列答案
相关题目

A centuries-old tradition of wearing a white horse-hair wig in court ended for many judges when a simpler new dress code came into force.

While judges in criminal cases will still wear them, those in civil and family hearings will appear bare-headed in court, wearing a new-style plain black robe, the British government said.

After a long debate, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Philips, head of the judiciary(司法部) in England and Wales, finally ordered the changes in an attempt to modernize the courts.

Wigs have been an emblem(象征) of the British legal system since the 17th century when the fashion for wearing them in wider society went through to the courts.For hundreds of years before the reign(统治)of Charles II, judges and lawyers were expected to come to court with short hair and a beard.

The decision to abandon wigs has disappointed traditionalists who argue that they give judges an air of authority and impartiality.Wigs could also protect them from angry members of the public.John Mortimer, the barrister and author of the “Rumpole of the Bailey” books, opposed the changes.“The idea’s ridiculous! A barrister without his wig would be like a doctor without a stethoscope(听诊器),” he wrote in a newspaper article when the changes were first proposed.

However, modernists argue that wigs are a hangover from the past that could intimidate people in court.In a newspaper interview, Lord Phillips described wigs as an anachronism(不合时宜之物)that gave the public a false impression of judges.

A Ministry of Justice survey last year found 70 percent of court workers wanted to keep wigs, compared to 42 percent of the public.

1.The reasons why wigs should be kept are the following EXCEPT________.

A.to build up the fair image of the judges.

B.to keep the judges from the harm from the audience.

C.to make the audience fear the judges.

D.to symbolize justice.

2.According to the British government, wigs will still be worn in ________.

A.murder cases         B.divorce cases           C.property cases D.real estate cases

3.The underlined word ‘intimidate’ in Paragraph 4 means ________.

A.frightened             B.dissatisfied            C.amused                 D.annoyed

4.Based on the article, which of the following inferences is TRUE?

A.Wearing wigs were very popular in the 17th century in Britain.

B.A stethoscope to a doctor is what a wig to a traditionalist.

C.The courts started the fashion of wearing wigs.

D.Many people favor the wigs for the judges.

5.The article is mainly about _________.

A.the difficulty in abandoning wigs in court.

B.the history of wearing wigs and the end of it.

C.abandoning wigs for many judges and the debate caused by it.

D.the opinion of the public and court workers on abandoning wigs.

A centuries-old tradition of wearing a white horse-hair wig in court ended for many judges when a simpler new dress code came into force.

While judges in criminal cases will still wear them, those in civil and family hearings will appear bare-headed in court, wearing a new-style plain black robe, the British government said.

After a long debate, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Philips, head of the judiciary(司法部) in England and Wales, finally ordered the changes in an attempt to modernize the courts.

Wigs have been an emblem(象征) of the British legal system since the 17th century when the fashion for wearing them in wider society went through to the courts.For hundreds of years before the reign(统治)of Charles II, judges and lawyers were expected to come to court with short hair and a beard.

The decision to abandon wigs has disappointed traditionalists who argue that they give judges an air of authority and impartiality.Wigs could also protect them from angry members of the public.John Mortimer, the barrister and author of the “Rumpole of the Bailey” books, opposed the changes.“The idea’s ridiculous! A barrister without his wig would be like a doctor without a stethoscope(听诊器),” he wrote in a newspaper article when the changes were first proposed.

However, modernists argue that wigs are a hangover from the past that could intimidate people in court.In a newspaper interview, Lord Phillips described wigs as an anachronism(不合时宜之物)that gave the public a false impression of judges.

A Ministry of Justice survey last year found 70 percent of court workers wanted to keep wigs, compared to 42 percent of the public.

1.The reasons why wigs should be kept are the following EXCEPT________.

A.to build up the fair image of the judges.

B.to keep the judges from the harm from the audience.

C.to make the audience fear the judges.

D.to symbolize justice.

2.According to the British government, wigs will still be worn in ________.

A.murder cases         B.divorce cases           C.property cases D.real estate cases

3.The underlined word ‘intimidate’ in Paragraph 4 means ________.

A.frightened             B.dissatisfied            C.amused                 D.annoyed

4.Based on the article, which of the following inferences is TRUE?

A.Wearing wigs were very popular in the 17th century in Britain.

B.A stethoscope to a doctor is what a wig to a traditionalist.

C.The courts started the fashion of wearing wigs.

D.Many people favor the wigs for the judges.

5.The article is mainly about _________.

A.the difficulty in abandoning wigs in court.

B.the history of wearing wigs and the end of it.

C.abandoning wigs for many judges and the debate caused by it.

D.the opinion of the public and court workers on abandoning wigs.

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网