题目内容

【题目】 Our dog Sandy is a golden retriever( 寻回犬). Once we performed an experiment to see how keen his nose was.There was one particular pile that must have had hundreds of sticks. We picked up one stick carved an X on it, walked away from the pile and then threw it back into the pile, not once but a dozen times into the pile. It was impossible for us to tell with any certainty which stick we had originally chosen. Each time he brought back that stick. It wasn't the shape or the size or the look of the stick that he used to pick it out from all the others. It was the smell we left on the stick. It is hard to imagine, but for dogs every living creature has its own distinctive smell.

The noses of people have about 5 million cells that sense smell. Dogs' noses have anywhere from 125 to 300 million cells. Moreover, these cells are closer to the surface than cells in our noses, and more active. It has been estimated that dogs such as Sandy have noses that are a million times more sensitive than ours. Clothes that we haven't worn for week,and places we've only touched lightly indicate our presence to dogs.

His ears are also remarkable. He can hear sounds that humans can't and at distances which are astonishing. It is over our head to know and understand that world. Yet we have the advantage of being able to imagine what his experience is like, though he probably doesn't think too much about how we see the world.

The environment is the world that all living things share. Living creatures are born into the environment and are part of it. Yet there is no creature who perceives (感知到) all of what is and what happens. For a dog like Sandy a book isn't much different than a stick, whereas for us one stick is pretty much like every other stick. There is no one world experienced by all living creatures.

1Why did the author conduct the experiment?

A.To train Sandy to pick out sticks.

B.To show how fast Sandy found sticks.

C.To prove sensitivity of Sandy's nose.

D.To teach Sandy to tell different smells.

2What does the author intend to do in paragraph 2?

A.Support the conclusion with numbers.

B.Summarize the previous paragraph.

C.Provide some advice for the readers.

D.Introduce a new topic for discussion.

3What does the underlined idiom in paragraph 3 mean?

A.Amazing.B.Difficult.

C.Reasonable.D.Inconvenient.

4Which of the following best expresses the author's opinion in the last paragraph?

A.Worlds to experience.

B.An environment to share.

C.No environment, no creatures.

D.One environment, many worlds.

【答案】

1C

2A

3B

4D

【解析】

本文是一篇说明文。作者做了一个实验证明Sandy的鼻子非常灵敏,耳朵也非常灵敏,借此说明环境是所有生物共享的世界,不同的物种对于环境有不同的感知。

1】细节理解题。根据第一段的Once we performed an experiment to see how keen his nose was.(我们做了一个实验,看看他的鼻子有多尖)可知,作者做这个实验是为了证明桑迪的鼻子很敏感。故选C

2】推理判断题。根据第二段的The noses of people have about 5 million cells that sense smell. Dogs' noses have anywhere from 125 to 300 million cells.(人类的鼻子有大约500万个可以感知气味的细胞。狗的鼻子有1亿25百万到3亿个细胞)可知,第二段用人类鼻子和狗的鼻子的细胞数进行对比来说明狗鼻子的灵敏度,由此判断出,作者在第二段中用数字来支持结论。故选A

3】词义猜测题。根据第三段的It is over our head to know and understand that world. Yet we have the advantage of being able to imagine what his experience is like(我们无法了解那个世界。然而,我们的优势是能够想象他的经历是什么样的)可知句中yet意为然而,跟前句是转折关系,we have the advantage of意为我们有……的优势,所以对比前文的over our head是与之相反的意思,over our head意为困难的,相当于difficult,故选B

4推理判断题。根据最后一段的The environment is the world that all living things share. Living creatures are born into the environment and are part of it. Yet there is no creature who perceives all of what is and what happensThere is no one world experienced by all living creatures.(环境是所有生物共享的世界。生物出生在环境中,是环境的一部分。然而,没有一种生物能感知一切的存在和发生。没有一个世界是所有生物都经历过的)可知,任何一种生物都不能完全地体会到一个世界,由此判断出,最能表达作者观点的是一个环境、多个世界。故选D

练习册系列答案
相关题目

【题目】阅读下面材料,在空白处填入适当的内容(1个单词)或括号内单词的正确形式。

The fire at Notre-Dame Cathedral de Paris has raised questions about the condition of thousands of other cathedrals and historic 1 (structure) across Europe. It also raises questions about whether European government are doing enough 2 (keep) up and care for such buildings.

Tibor Navracsics, the European Union’s top cultural official, told The Associated Press that “we are so used to our outstanding cultural heritage in Europe that we tend to forget that it 3 (need) constant care and attention.” Some people say the fire was a wake-up call, not just for Europe,4 for the whole world.

Large fires have long robbed humanity 5 knowledge, art and treasures. In 2015, the German engineering company Siemens 6 (find) that Scotland had about ten damaging fires a year, while England lost at least a dozen listed buildings a year. In Germany, seventy historic buildings have been 7 (heavy) damaged since 2000.

Experts say that 8 is needed is continuous attention and maintenance. Some say world-famous monuments like Notre-Dame are the 9 (drive) force behind tourism and should get more respect. Sneska Quaedvlieg-Mihailovic, who heads the heritage group Europa Nostra, noted the 10 (important) of such respect. “Cultural heritage is a gold mine. You cannot exploit it and then just leave the mine and go to another one.” She said.

【题目】 As recently as 15 years ago, if you wanted to catch up on the news, you could look at a handful of publications or a few nightly programs. And if you wanted to listen to music, you could turn on MTV or fiddle with your radio. People in major cities had more options, because a large population can support specialty shops. 1.

Today, as we all know, access to information has exploded. One consequence, according to Toure, a cultural critic writing in Salon, is that the ability of pop culture to unify us-- he refers to the massive interest in Michael Jackson’s Thriller, or Nirvana’s Nevermind--has been eroded, probably forever. Steven Hyden, also writing in Salon, counters that whatever the advantages and disadvantages of a centralized pop-culture authority, the monoculture never actually existed.

2 Even when it supposedly existed, its content largely depended on other characteristics of your little corner of the world. In the 1992-1993 school year, I was a student at a multiracial and relatively urban junior high school in California’s central valley. We listened to Salt-n-Pepa, Snoop Doggy Dogg, and Kris Kross, with the latter having inspired a trend in which kids wore their clothes backwards. The next year I was enrolled in a mostly white junior high school in leafy Chiago suburb. One of the houses was famous for having appeared in the 1990 film “Home Alone”; the popular bands were Nirvana, Hole and the Smashing Pumpkins; and the biggest pop-cultural event of the school year was Kurt Cobain’s suicide.

But Toure’s point is about the virtues of common cultural experience. It seems he is recalling centralized media only in so far as it’s a distribution system that fostered ( 促进) that outcome.

3 It doesn’t matter whether a record is released by an important label or an indie ( 独立制片人); if it’s online, people can usually find, forward, share and promote it. But what’s interesting and perhaps surprising, given that both Toure and Mr Hyden seem to agree that the old distribution favored big media, is that we still have widely shared cultural experiences. Just think of Barack Obama doing the little hand gesture from Beyonce’s “Single Ladies ” video.

4. It’s safe to say that the monoculture never really existed, and that some artists still reach a wide audience, whether we like it or not.

A.That suggests that we like pop culture partly because it’s a shared experience, regardless of quality.

B.However, in vast areas of the world you had to work to get outside the mainstream.

C.Whether you like it or not, “monoculture” is here with us.

D.I think Mr Hyden is correct that the concept of a “monoculture” is a bit of a myth.

E.They see globalization as being the spread of a monoculture, based on western values, which is killing the cultural diversity of the world.

F.And it’s true that the ways we now consume pop culture to some extent level the playing field.

违法和不良信息举报电话:027-86699610 举报邮箱:58377363@163.com

精英家教网