题目内容
When I was seven my father gave me a Timex, my first watch. I loved it, wore it for years, and haven’t had another one since it stopped ticking a decade ago. Why? Because I don’t need one. I have a mobile phone and I’m always near someone with an iPod or something like that. All these devices(装置)tell the time----which is why, if you look around, you’ll see lots of empty wrists; sales of watches to young adults have been going down since 2007.
This is ridiculous(荒唐的). Expensive cars go faster than cheap cars. Expensive clothes hang better than cheap clothes. But these days all watches tell the time as well as all the other watches. Expensive watches come with extra functions----but who needs them? How often do you dive to 300 metres into the sea or need to find your direction in the area around the South Pole? So why pay that much of five years’ school fees for watches that allow you to do these things?
If justice were done, the Swiss watch industry should have closed down when the Japanese discovered how to make accurate watches for a five-pound note. Instead the Swiss reinvented the watch, with the aid of millions of pounds’ worth of advertising, as a message about the man wearing it. Rolexes are for those who spend their weekends climbing icy mountains; a Patek Philippe is for one from a rich or noble family; a Breitling suggests you like to pilot planes across the world.
Watches are now classified as “investments”(投资). A 1994 Philippe recently sold for nearly $350,000, while 1960s Rolexes have gone from $15,000 to $30,000 plus in a year. But a watch is not an investment. It’s a toy for self-satisfaction, a matter of fashion. Prices may keep going up----they’ve been rising for 15 years. But when fashion moves on, the owner of that $350,000 beauty will suddenly find his pride and joy is no more a good investment than my childhood Timex.
1.The sales of watches to young people have fallen because they_______.
A. have other devices to tell the time
B. think watches too expensive
C. prefer to wear an iPod
D. have no sense of time
2.It seems ridiculous to the writer that _______.
A. people dive 300 metres into the sea
B. expensive clothes sell better than cheap ones
C. cheap cars don’t run as fast as expensive ones
D. expensive watches with unnecessary functions still sell
3.What can be learnt about Swiss watch industry from the passage?
A. It targets rich people as its potential customers.
B. It’s hard for the industry to beat its competitors.
C. It wastes a huge amount of money in advertising.
D. It’s easy for the industry to reinvent cheap watches.
4.Which would be the best title for the passage?
A. Timex or Rolex?
B. My Childhood Timex
C. Watches? Not for Me!
D. Watches----a Valuable Collection
1.A
2.D
3.A
4.C
【解析】
试题分析:本文主要讲述的很多人实际上并不需要手表。手表现在已经成为了投资物品
1.细节判断题。根据第1段All these devices tell the time …sales of watches to young adults have been going down可知面向年轻人销售的手表销售额下降主要是因为很多设备都能报时。
2.细节题。根据第三段后四行Expensive watches come with extra functions—but who needs them? How often do you dive to 300 metres into the sea or need to find your direction in the area around the South Pole? So why pay that much of five years’ school fees for watches that allow you to do these things? 说明手表实际上没有什么用途,但是很多人都购买,这真是荒谬。故D项内容正确。
3.细节题。根据第四段Instead the Swiss reinvented the watch, with the aid of millions of pounds’ worth of advertising, as a message about the man wearing it. Rolexes are for those who spend their weekends climbing icy mountains; a Patek Philippe is for one from a rich or noble family; a Breitling suggests you like to pilot planes across the world. 说明瑞士的手表经营商把富人当成了自己的目标人群,故选A项。
4.主旨大意题。本文讲述在现代许多移动设备都能报时的前提下,还花费很多钱购买名表究竟是否合适,因此选择C“手表?我不要!”为标题较为形象生动也很贴切。A“天美时还是劳力士”,B“我的孩童时代的天美时”,D“手表—昂贵的选择”都不符合文章主题
考点:日常生活类阅读。

假如你叫李平,是一位成绩优秀的学生,你班班主任在安排座位时,让成绩好的学生和成绩差的学生作同桌,这在你们班成绩优秀的学生中引起了反响,团课上大家就此进行了讨论。请以书信形式向报社编辑写封信,陈述学生讨论结果以及个人观点。
赞同 | 反对 | 你的观点 |
1.人人有长处和不足,成绩差的学生也有可取之处; 2.通过帮助学习差的学生的学习从而使他们建立自信。 | 1.部分学习差的学生常常违反校规,担心自己会受影响,养成坏习惯。2.老是问问题,使自己不能专心学习。 |
|
注意:1.词数:100~120,短文的开头已为你写好,不计入总词数。
2.短文需包括表中所有要点,内容可适当发挥,以使行文连贯。
3.参考词汇:成绩差的学生:a slower student
Dear editor, We have held a discussion about whether it is good or not for a top student to share a desk with a slower student_________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________