题目内容
Do you want to live another 100 years or more? Some experts say that scientific progress will one day help humans to last tens of years longer than what is now seen as the natural limit(限制)of the human life span(寿命).
“ I think we are knocking at the door of immortality (永生),” said Michael Zey, a Montclair State University business professor and author of two books on the future. “ I think by 2075 we will see it and that’s a conservative estimate(保守估计).”
At the conference in San Francisco, Donald Louria, a professor at New Jersey Medical School in Newark said progress in using genes as well as nanotechnology(纳米技术)makes it likely that humans will live in the future beyond what has been possible in the past. “ There is a great push so that people can live from 120 to 180 years,” he said. “ Some have suggested that there is no limit and that people could live to 200 or 300 or 500 years.”
However, many scientists who research into aging are doubtful about it and say the human body is just not designed to last about 120 years. Even with healthier lifestyles and less disease, they say failure of the brain and organs will finally lead all humans to death.
Scientists also disagree on what kind of life the super aged might live. “It remains to be seen whether you could be healthy enough to have good quality of life when you pass 120.” said Leonard Poon, director of the University of Georgia Gerontology Center. “ At present people who could get to that point are not in good health at all.”
1.By saying “ we are knocking at the door immortality”, Michael Zey means_____.
A.they believe that there is no limit of living
B.they are sure to find the truth about long living
C.they have got some ideas about long living
D.they are able to make people live beyond the present life span
2.Donald Louria’s attitude toward long living is that_____.
A.people can live from 120 to 180
B.it is still doubtful how long humans can live
C.the human body is designed to last about 120 years
D.it is possible for humans to live longer in the future
3.The underlined “ it” (Para. 4) refers to_____.
A.a great push
B.the idea of living beyond the present life span
C.the idea of living from 200 to 300
D.the conservative estimate
4.What would be the best title for this text?
A.Living longer or not
B.Science, technology and long living
C.No limit for human life
D.Healthy lifestyle and long living
1.C
2.D
3.B
4.A
【解析】
试题分析:本文讲述的是科学家在研究人类是否能够活得更长更健康,以及不同的人对此问题的不同的反应。
1.C 推理题。根据本句we are knocking at the door of immortality (永生),指我们敲响了永生的门,说明我们已经了解到了一些关于永生的秘密,结合第一段内容可知C正确。
2.D 细节题。根据第二段最后3行“ There is a great push so that people can live from 120 to 180 years,” he said. “ Some have suggested that there is no limit and that people could live to 200 or 300 or 500 years说明他认为人类永生是有可能的,故D正确。
3.B 推理题。这里的it就是指上一段里的“ There is a great push so that people can live from 120 to 180 years,” he said. “ Some have suggested that there is no limit and that people could live to 200 or 300 or 500 years.活的时间超过现在的预测。故B正确。
4.A 主旨大意题。本文讨论的主要就是人类在未来是否可以活的更久一点,故A项正确。
考点:考查科普类短文阅读
点评:对于人类是否可以活得更为久远,文章中给出了答案。属于科普类的短文,此类文章的最大的障碍是词汇以及考生对阅读内容的不熟悉,需要考生在阅读的时候有足够的耐心。要养成在上下文串联中猜测词义的能力,根据上下文中出现的同义词,近义词,反义词,以及词义的解释来理解生词。同时要抓住文章的中心,不要受其他信息的影响。要根据题目及选项以及文章的上下文串联合理的判断推理。