ÌâÄ¿ÄÚÈÝ
×ÔÉϺ£¸´µ©´óѧ¿ªÊ¼Í¨¹ýÃæÊÔ×ÔÖ÷ÕÐÊÕѧÉúºó£¬Â½ÐøÓÖÓÐһЩѧУ¼ÓÈëµ½ÕâÒ»ÐÐÁС£ÕâһеÄÕÐÉú·½Ê½ÔÚѧÉúÖÐÒý·¢ÁËÒ»³¡ÌÖÂÛ¡£¼ÙÈçÄãÊÇÀ£¬Çë¸ù¾ÝϱíÌṩµÄÄÚÈݸø¶þʮһÊÀ¼Í±¨Ð´Ò»·âÐÅ·´Ó³ÌÖÂÛÇé¿ö£¬²¢±í´ïÄã×Ô¼ºµÄ¹Ûµã¡£150´Ê×óÓÒ¡£
60%µÄѧÉúÔÞ³É
|
40%µÄѧÉú·´¶Ô
|
1. ÃæÊÔ¿ÉÒÔÈ«Ãæ×ۺϵØÆÀ¼ÛÒ»¸öѧÉú£» 2. ¹ÄÀøѧÉú·¢Õ¹¸öÐÔºÍÌس¤£» 3. Éç»áÐèÒªÒ»ÖÖ¸ü¼Ó¿ª·ÅºÍÓÐЧµØ¼ȡ·½Ê½¡£ | 1. ÃæÊÔ´øÓÐÖ÷¹ÛÐÔ¡¢Æ¬ÃæÐÔ£¬¿ÉÄܲ»¹«Õý£» 2. ²¢·ÇËùÓÐѧÉú¶¼Éó¤ÔÚÃæÊÔÖÐչʾ×Ô¼º£» 3. ²»¿ÉÄÜÔÚ3-5·ÖÖÓÄÚÆÀ¼ÛÒ»¸öÈË¡£ |
²Î¿¼´Ê»ã: comprehensive ×ۺϵġ¡¡¡¡¡ subjective Ö÷¹ÛµÄ¡¡¡¡¡¡ one-sided¡¡ ƬÃæµÄ
Dear editor,
Recently, a discussion has been held in our school on whether it is reasonable for the universities to admit students through interviews. The results are as follows:
Dear editor,
Recently, a discussion has been held in our school on whether it is reasonable for the universities to admit students through interviews. The results are as follows:
60% of the students support this action. They express that interviews can evaluate a student in a more thorough and comprehensive way. It can encourage students to develop their own interests and personalities. What¡¯s more, with the development of society, a more open and efficient way to test a student¡¯s abilities is needed.
On the other hand, the other 40% students are against this idea. They argue that first, interviews may be subjective and one-sided, which could lead to unfairness. Second, not all students are good at showing their talents in interviews. Last but not least, a student can¡¯t be judged in only three or five minutes.
I hold the view that ¡¡
Yours sincerely,
Li Hua

È¥Ä꣬ÉϺ£¸´µ©´óѧ¿ªÊ¼Í¨¹ýÃæÊÔ×ÔÖ÷ÕÐÊÕѧÉú£¬½ñÄêÓÖÓÐһЩѧУ¼ÓÈëµ½ÕâÒ»ÐÐÁС£ÕâһеÄÕÐÉú·½Ê½ÔÚѧÉúÖÐÒý·¢ÁËÒ»³¡ÌÖÂÛ¡£¼ÙÈçÄãÊÇÀ£¬Çë¸ù¾ÝϱíÌṩµÄÄÚÈݸø¶þʮһÊÀ¼Í±¨±à¼Ð´Ò»·âÐÅ·´Ó³ÌÖÂÛÇé¿ö¡£
60% µÄѧÉúÔÞ³É | 40%µÄѧÉú·´¶Ô |
1£®ÃæÊÔ¿ÉÒÔÈ«Ãæ×ۺϵØÆÀ¼ÛÒ»¸öѧÉú£» 2.¹ÄÀøѧÉú·¢Õ¹¸öÐÔºÍÌس¤£» 3£®Éç»áÐèÒªÒ»ÖÖ¸ü¼Ó¿ª·ÅºÍÓÐЧµÄ¼ȡ·½Ê½¡£ | 1.ÃæÊÔ´øÓÐÖ÷¹ÛÐÔ¡¢Æ¬ÃæÐÔ£¬¿ÉÄܲ»¹«Õý£» 2.²¢·ÇËùÓÐѧÉú¶¼ÉÃÓÚÔÚÃæÊÔÖÐչʾ×Ô¼º£» 3.²»¿ÉÄÜÔÚ3-5·ÖÖÓÄÚÆÀ¼ÛÒ»¸öÈË¡£ |
È¥Ä꣬ÉϺ£¸´µ©´óѧ¿ªÊ¼Í¨¹ýÃæÊÔ×ÔÖ÷ÕÐÊÕѧÉú£¬½ñÄêÓÖÓÐһЩѧУ¼ÓÈëµ½ÕâÒ»ÐÐÁС£ÕâһеÄÕÐÉú·½Ê½ÔÚѧÉúÖÐÒý·¢ÁËÒ»³¡ÌÖÂÛ¡£¼ÙÈçÄãÊÇÀ£¬Çë¸ù¾ÝϱíÌṩµÄÄÚÈݸø¶þʮһÊÀ¼Í±¨±à¼Ð´Ò»·âÐÅ·´Ó³ÌÖÂÛÇé¿ö¡£
60% µÄѧÉúÔÞ³É |
40%µÄѧÉú·´¶Ô |
1£®ÃæÊÔ¿ÉÒÔÈ«Ãæ×ۺϵØÆÀ¼ÛÒ»¸öѧÉú£» 2.¹ÄÀøѧÉú·¢Õ¹¸öÐÔºÍÌس¤£» 3£®Éç»áÐèÒªÒ»ÖÖ¸ü¼Ó¿ª·ÅºÍÓÐЧµÄ¼ȡ·½Ê½¡£ |
1.ÃæÊÔ´øÓÐÖ÷¹ÛÐÔ¡¢Æ¬ÃæÐÔ£¬¿ÉÄܲ»¹«Õý£» 2.²¢·ÇËùÓÐѧÉú¶¼ÉÃÓÚÔÚÃæÊÔÖÐչʾ×Ô¼º£» 3.²»¿ÉÄÜÔÚ3-5·ÖÖÓÄÚÆÀ¼ÛÒ»¸öÈË¡£ |
3comprehensive×ۺϵģ¬subjectiveÖ÷¹ÛµÄone-sidedƬÃæµÄevaluateÆÀ¼Û
È¥Ä꣬ÉϺ£¸´µ©´óѧ¿ªÊ¼Í¨¹ýÃæÊÔ×ÔÖ÷ÕÐÊÕѧÉú£¬½ñÄêÓÖÓÐһЩѧУ¼ÓÈëµ½ÕâÒ»ÐÐÁС£ÕâһеÄÕÐÉú·½Ê½ÔÚѧÉúÖÐÒý·¢ÁËÒ»³¡ÌÖÂÛ¡£¼ÙÈçÄãÊÇÀ£¬Çë¸ù¾ÝϱíÌṩµÄÄÚÈݸø¶þʮһÊÀ¼Í±¨±à¼Ð´Ò»·âÐÅ·´Ó³ÌÖÂÛÇé¿ö¡£
60% µÄѧÉúÔÞ³É | 40%µÄѧÉú·´¶Ô |
1£®ÃæÊÔ¿ÉÒÔÈ«Ãæ×ۺϵØÆÀ¼ÛÒ»¸öѧÉú£» 2.¹ÄÀøѧÉú·¢Õ¹¸öÐÔºÍÌس¤£» 3£®Éç»áÐèÒªÒ»ÖÖ¸ü¼Ó¿ª·ÅºÍÓÐЧµÄ¼ȡ·½Ê½¡£ | 1.ÃæÊÔ´øÓÐÖ÷¹ÛÐÔ¡¢Æ¬ÃæÐÔ£¬¿ÉÄܲ»¹«Õý£» 2.²¢·ÇËùÓÐѧÉú¶¼ÉÃÓÚÔÚÃæÊÔÖÐչʾ×Ô¼º£» 3.²»¿ÉÄÜÔÚ3-5·ÖÖÓÄÚÆÀ¼ÛÒ»¸öÈË¡£ |
3comprehensive×ۺϵģ¬subjectiveÖ÷¹ÛµÄone-sidedƬÃæµÄevaluateÆÀ¼Û