题目内容
16．I'm（61）theonly daughter of my parents，so they are worried（62）abouteverything I do．For example，（63）WhenI ride my bike，my parents won't let me（64）ride（ride） by myself．They are afraid I might fall off my bike and hurt（65）myself．They are taking great trouble to support the bike，with my mother even（66）carrying（carry） a first-aid box．I'm not free to ride and I often say （67）angrily（angry），"why not let me ride alone？"Now，most families have one child．Parents want to do everything for their children．This does no good（68）tothem．Too much love from parents may prevent children from（69）being（be） independent．In my opinion，parents should let their children do（70）whatthey should do alone．
分析 文章中主人公我是家里的独生女，父母溺爱我，当我骑自行车的时候，爸爸在一旁扶着妈妈甚至在后面背着急救箱．现在很多孩子都是独生子，父母为孩子做一切能做的事情，就导致了孩子不能独立．父母应该让孩子去做他们能做的事情．
解答 61．the．考查定冠词．only daughter 表示"唯一的孩子"，所以用the表示"特指"．
62．about．考查短语的用法．worry about 或者是be worriedabout 表示"为…担心"．
63．When．考查引导词．表示"当我去骑自行车时，父母不会让我自己去"．
64．ride．考查固定结构的用法．let sb do sth，让某人做某事儿．
65．myself．考查反身代词．hurt的主语和宾语但是"I"，所以宾语用反身代词．66．carrying．考查非谓语动词用法．with复合结构的考查，with+n/pron+非谓语动词，mymother与carry之间的关系应是主动，故应改为carrying．
67．angrily 词性的考查．我生气的说，此处修饰动词，故应为副词形式．
68．to．考查介词的用法．do goodto固定结构的用法，对---有好处．
69．being．考查非谓语动词．介词from后用doing，prevent sb from doing sth 表示"阻止某人做某事"．
70．what．考查引导词词的用法． 此处为宾语从句，且从句中缺少宾语，让孩子们去做他们一个人能做的事情．
点评 考查短文改错．有些单词一般只有the修饰，如only，same，last等，平时注意总结．
练习册系列答案
期末金牌卷系列答案
轻松课堂标准练系列答案
相关题目
6．No one in the department but Tom and I _________ that the director is going to resign．（ ）
| A． | knows | B． | am to know | C． | know | D． | have known |
7．
Do we need an"Ivy （常春藤） League"？
China may soon have its own"Ivy League"，with a union of top universities．
The term originally referred to an athletic conference of eight top universities in the northeastern US．The Chinese version，which was officially started in mid-October，consists of nine famous universities，including Peking，Tsinghua，Zhejiang and Fudan．The union is supposed to result in student exchange programs，recognition of academic achievements，and other joint programs．
The news of this Chinese"Ivy League"has received mixed responses from the public and press．Some negative critics have dismissed it as yet another example of the wishful copying of international practices without fully understanding them．Others say that the"Ivy League"is not necessary but that the union is a good idea，one that could promote academic development．
So what's your opinion on a Chinese"Ivy League"？Do we need one？
Yes．Ivy League or not，nine of China's best universities cooperating is a good thing．
1．These universities combining resources could create a better environment for students and for research．It could also save a lot of time and resources because it would mean fewer unnecessary investments for some of the universities．
2．Allowing students to move to or have exchanges with other universities could broaden their horizons，improve their social skills and create more employment opportunities．The results could be more important than lessons and achievements．
3．The term"Ivy League"carries a sense of academic excellence，tradition and reputation．If borrowing such a term could encourage students'and professors'mental state and improve Chinese higher education，then there's no reason not to do it．
No．Universities should do some work on increasing cooperation instead of copying an"Ivy League"model．
1．Many Chinese universities already have such cooperation with each other．If this cooperation were associated with the"Ivy League"，it would just distract （分散） attention and resources and have a negative effect．
2．These Chinese universities are all state-run and most get their funding from the government．They're quite similar to each other in many ways and more cooperation wouldn't bring about as much potential ability as between，say，public and private，or Chinese and foreign universities．
3．China should find its own way to develop world-class universities instead of by copying some foreign practices．We have our own unique conditions and foreign lessons often don't apply well here．
Do we need an"Ivy League"？
Do we need an"Ivy （常春藤） League"？China may soon have its own"Ivy League"，with a union of top universities．
The term originally referred to an athletic conference of eight top universities in the northeastern US．The Chinese version，which was officially started in mid-October，consists of nine famous universities，including Peking，Tsinghua，Zhejiang and Fudan．The union is supposed to result in student exchange programs，recognition of academic achievements，and other joint programs．
The news of this Chinese"Ivy League"has received mixed responses from the public and press．Some negative critics have dismissed it as yet another example of the wishful copying of international practices without fully understanding them．Others say that the"Ivy League"is not necessary but that the union is a good idea，one that could promote academic development．
So what's your opinion on a Chinese"Ivy League"？Do we need one？
Yes．Ivy League or not，nine of China's best universities cooperating is a good thing．
1．These universities combining resources could create a better environment for students and for research．It could also save a lot of time and resources because it would mean fewer unnecessary investments for some of the universities．
2．Allowing students to move to or have exchanges with other universities could broaden their horizons，improve their social skills and create more employment opportunities．The results could be more important than lessons and achievements．
3．The term"Ivy League"carries a sense of academic excellence，tradition and reputation．If borrowing such a term could encourage students'and professors'mental state and improve Chinese higher education，then there's no reason not to do it．
No．Universities should do some work on increasing cooperation instead of copying an"Ivy League"model．
1．Many Chinese universities already have such cooperation with each other．If this cooperation were associated with the"Ivy League"，it would just distract （分散） attention and resources and have a negative effect．
2．These Chinese universities are all state-run and most get their funding from the government．They're quite similar to each other in many ways and more cooperation wouldn't bring about as much potential ability as between，say，public and private，or Chinese and foreign universities．
3．China should find its own way to develop world-class universities instead of by copying some foreign practices．We have our own unique conditions and foreign lessons often don't apply well here．
Do we need an"Ivy League"？
| Ivy in America | It originally referred to an athletic conference of （71）eight top universities in the northeast of America． | ||
Ivy in China | Formation | Nine famous universities | |
（72）Purposes of the union | To exchange students | ||
| To（73）recognize academic achievements | |||
| To work on the joint programs | |||
| （74）Responses from the public | |||
| Positive side | （75）Negative side | ||
| The cooperation is good for the combination of resources and recreation of （76）a better environment． | Attention will be drawn away and （78）resources will be distracted． | ||
| Students will have less difficulty in finding jobs through the student exchange program． | The cooperation won't have great effect because of their （79）similarities in running universities． | ||
| The cooperation will （77）encourage the students and professors mentally． | China should develop world-class universities in its （80）unique way without copying foreign countries blindly． | ||
4．To learn English well，we should find opportunities to hear English ______ as much as we can．（ ）
| A． | speak | B． | spoken | C． | speaking | D． | to speak |