题目内容

It will not be ________ we can meet again.

A. long before B. before long C. soon after D. shortly after

解析:

略

练习册系列答案

暑假作业吉林人民出版社系列答案

津桥教育暑假提优衔接新世界出版社系列答案

暑假作业假期园地中原农民出版社系列答案

系统集成暑假生活北京师范大学出版社系列答案

快乐暑假假期面对面南方出版社系列答案

期末加假期期末大赢家冲刺100分西安出版社系列答案

假期作业自我检测吉林出版集团有限责任公司系列答案

暑假新时空系列答案

赢在假期衔接教材寒假合肥工业大学出版社系列答案

暑假总动员期末复习暑假衔接云南科技出版社系列答案

相关题目

阅读理解

　　Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs(金砖四国)?If so, it may end up sounding like a famous ball-point pen maker－BIC．An argument is being made that Goldman Sach's famous marketing device(策略), the BRICs, should really be the BICs．

　　“Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?”asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in an article for Foreign Policy．Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew Kuchins of“The Russian Balance Sheet”, thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses．He writes：

　　“The country's economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group．I have just returned from Moscow, which is always dull around this season．For the last seven years, Russia has taken very few measures to improve its economy．Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas．”

　　Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side．The International Monetary Fund figures that the Russian economy will fall by 6.7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8.5 percent and India 5.4 percent．There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0.7 percent, but it is still doing far better than Russia．

　　But the BRICs are not just about economy．As is mentioned above, it is a marketing device to encourage investors(投资者)to focus on the big promising players．From an investment standpoint, it could be argued that Russia is leading the BRICs．Its stock market is up 128 percent this year while around 80 percent is for the other three．

　　At very least, despite Russia's economic underperformance, its stock market outperformance does suggest it is indeed one of the group．

(1)

According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?
[　　]
A．	China
B．	Russia
C．	Brazil
D．	India

(2)

According to Aslund, Russia shouldn't be a BRIC partly because ________．
[　　]
A．	its economic performance is worse than that of the others
B．	its leaders are not good at managing economy
C．	it has taken effective measures to improve its economy
D．	it will no longer attract investors from other countries

(3)

From the passage we know that ________．
[　　]
A．	Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government
B．	Russia outperformed the other three countries in stock market
C．	most people disagree Russia is included in the BRICs
D．	the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later

(4)

The author seems to ________．
[　　]
A．	suggest it's time to kick Russia out of the BRICs
B．	feel worried about the economy of the BRICs
C．	think Russia is worth being one of the group
D．	show disappointment to Russia's economy

阅读理解

　　Is it time to kick Russia out of the BRICs(金砖四国)?If so, it may end up sounding like a famous ball-point pen maker－BIC．An argument is being made that Goldman Sach’s famous marketing device(策略), the BRICs, should really be the BICs．

　　“Is Russia really worth the name BRICs?” asks Anders Aslund, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, in an article for Foreign Policy．Aslund, who is also co-author with Andrew Kuchins of “The Russian Balance Sheet”, thinks the Russia of Putin and Medvedev is just not worthy of inclusion alongside Brazil, India and China in the list of future economic powerhouses．He writes：

　　“The country’s economic performance has fallen to such a weak level that one must ask whether it has any say at all on the global economy, compared with the other members of its group．I have just returned from Moscow, which is always dull around this season．For the last seven years, Russia has taken very few measures to improve its economy．Instead, the state has been living on oil and gas．”

　　Economically, Aslund has the numbers on his side．The International Monetary Fund figures that the Russian economy will fall by 6．7 percent in 2009, while China will grow 8．5 percent and India 5．4 percent．There is less of a case for Brazil, with a fall of 0．7 percent, but it is still doing far better than Russia．

　　At very least, despite Russia’s economic underperformance, its stock market outperformance does suggest it is indeed one of the group．

(1)

According to the passage, which country will enjoy the biggest increase in 2009?
[　　]
A．	China
B．	Russia
C．	Brazil
D．	India

(2)

According to Aslund, Russia shouldn’t be a BRIC partly because _________．
[　　]
A．	its economic performance is worse than that of the others
B．	its leaders are not good at managing economy
C．	it has taken effective measures to improve its economy
D．	it will no longer attract investors from other countries

(3)

From the passage we know that _________．
[　　]
A．	Anders Aslund is working for the Russian government
B．	Russia outperformed the other three countries in stock market
C．	most people disagree Russia is included in the BRICs
D．	the BRICs would end up being the BICs sooner or later

(4)

The author seems to _________．
[　　]
A．	suggest it’s time to kick Russia out of the BRICs
B．	feel worried about the economy of the BRICs
C．	think Russia is worth being one of the group
D．	show disappointment to Russia’s economy