题目内容
Decision-thinking is not unlikepoker—it often matters not only what you think, but also what others think youthink and what you think they think you think. The mental process (过程) is similar. Naturally, thiscard game has often been of considerable interest to people who are, by anystandards, good thinkers.
Thegreat mathematician John Von Neumann was one of the founders of game theory. Inparticular, he showed that all games fall into two classes: there are what hecalled games of “perfect information”, games like chess where the players can’thide anything or play tricks: they don’t win by chance, but by means of logicand skills. Then there are games of “imperfect information”, like poker, inwhich it is impossible to know in advance that one course of action is betterthan another.
One mistaken idea about business is that it can be treated as a game of perfectinformation. Quite the reverse.Business, politics, life itself are games which we must normally play with veryimperfect information. Business decisions are often made with many unknown andunknowable factors (因素) which would even puzzle (困惑) best poker players. But few business people find itcomfortable to admit that they are taking a chance, and many still prefer tobelieve that they are playing chess, not poker.
The subject discussed in this text is _______.
- A.the process of reaching decisions
- B.the difference between poker and chess
- C.the secret of making good business plans
- D.the value of information in winning games
本文段由3个自然段组成,这3个自然段分别论述了以下问题: ①decision-thinking与poker的相似性。 ②the game theory以及两种不同的games。 ③关于business decision的特点。 本题的4个选项把上面的问题都涉及了,问题在于:作者贯穿全文的基本意思是什么?本段提出关于商务决策的问题,是作为决策的一个方面进行讨论的,所以,它并不是全文讨论的问题。poker与chess的分类虽在第2自然段中进行了讨论,但是,此点与决策问题的逻辑关系应当是这样的:the game theory (the twoclasses-poker and chess)属于decision-thinking与decision-making。由此,我们就可以得出结论:本段的主旨是讨论决策过程的。
Once there was an 11-year-old boy who went fishing with his father in the middle of a New Hampshire lake. On the day before bass(巴斯鱼) season opened, they were fishing early in the evening, catching other fish with worms. Then the boy tied a small silver lure(鱼饵) and put it into the lake. Suddenly he felt that something very big pulling on the lure. His father watched with admiration as the boy skillfully brought the fish beside the bank. Finally he lifted the tired fish from the water. It was the largest one he had ever seen, but it was a bass.
The boy and his father looked at the big fish. The father lit a match and looked at his watch. It was 10 p.m.—two hours before the season opened. He looked at the fish, then at the boy. “You’ll have to put it back, son,” he said.
“Dad!” cried the boy. “There will be other fish,” said his father. “Not as big as this one,” cried the boy. He looked around the lake. No other fishermen or boats were in sight in the moonlight. He looked again at his father.
Even though no one had seen them, nor could anyone ever know what time he had caught the fish, the boy could tell from his father’s voice that the decision couldn’t be changed. He threw the huge bass into the black water. The big fish disappeared. The boy thought that he would never again see such a big fish.
That was 34 years ago. Today the boy is a successful architect in New York City. He often takes his own son and daughters to fish at the same place.
And he was right. He has never again caught such a large fish as the one he got that night long ago. But he does see that same fish ... again and again ... every time he has an ethical (道德的) decision to make. For, as his father had taught him, ethics are simple matters of right and wrong. It is only the practice of ethics that is difficult.
1.What happened when the big fish turned out to be a bass?
A.The boy and his father didn’t know what to do with the big fish. |
B.The father lit a match in order to check the time. |
C.The boy threw the bass back into the water willingly. |
D.They worried other fishermen might discover what they had done. |
2.From the text we know that the father _________.
A.didn’t love his son |
B.always disagreed with his son |
C.disliked the huge fish |
D.was firm and stubborn |
3.The successful architect went fishing with his children at the same place because _______.
A.they might catch a big fish there |
B.it was a most popular fishing spot |
C.he was taught a moral lesson there |
D.their children enjoyed fishing there |
4.What does the story imply (suggest)?
A.It is easy to say something, but difficult to do. |
B.An ethical decision is always easy to make. |
C.It’s hard to tell right from wrong sometimes. |
D.Fishing can help one to make right decisions. |